ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recumbency and bending are thought to provoke symptoms of reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The effect of exercise which involved bending and abdominal contractions was evaluated in symptomatic patients of GERD using continuous 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH test. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with GERD, confirmed by abnormal 24-hour esophageal pH study, performed exercise for 30 minutes consisting of 5 sessions of 6 minutes each. The exercise involved toe touching from supine, sitting and standing position of 2 minutes' duration each. Each 2 minutes' period included 8 repetitions of the same exercise of 15 seconds' duration. 24-hour esophageal pHmetry was done on day 1 without exercise and on day 2 with 30-minute exercise. Reflux time percent (RT%) pH <4 was compared between days 1 and 2 and 30 minutes before and during exercise. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were upright refluxers and 11 patients were combined refluxers, which included 4 patients with supine reflux and 7 patients who refluxed both in supine and upright positions. The median (range) 24-hour RT% on day 1 and day 2 was 7 (5-40) and 7 (4-46), respectively (p=0.15). RT% during 30 minutes exercise compared with 30 minutes before exercise was 6.6 (0-60) and 0.0 (0.0-80) (p=0.02), respectively. In combined and upright refluxers, RT% during and before exercise was 13 (0-53) and 0.0 (0.0-42) (p=0.008), respectively and 0.0 (0-60) and 0.0 (0-80), (p=0.71), respectively. RT% between upright and combined refluxers during exercise was 0.0 (0-60) and 13 (0-53), respectively (p=0.004). The mean (SD) LES pressure in mmHg in combined and upright refluxers was 7 (2.9) and 19.6 (6.8), respectively (p=0.008). Esophagitis in combined and upright refluxers was seen in 8 patients (72.7%) and 2 patients (14.3%), respectively. Two patients (8%) developed symptoms during exercise. CONCLUSION: Exercise which involves bending precipitates reflux in patients with moderate-to-severe GERD.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the operation of growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) clinic and longitudinal growth patterns of children. DESIGN: Prospective observation and intervention. SETTING: Outpatient department of a teaching hospital. METHODS: Less than 6 months old infants were registered at GMP clinic and followed for up to two years of age. Mothers were provided information, education and counselling about healthy growth of their infants. The outcome measure was change in weight after follow-up. RESULTS: We enrolled a cohort of 553 children in the first 6 months of life, of which 318 were males. Mean follow up period was 15.7 (SD+/-6.4) months. At enrollment 207 were underweight [weight-for-age Z score (WAZ<-2], of which 153 were from low-income families. The children from poorer families also gained weight regularly, although it was less than the higher income families. Of 346 infants with normal weight at registration, 305 maintained their weight gain by last follow-up visit. Of 207 underweight infants at enrollment 128 improved their weight gain by the last follow-up visit. Overall 433 infants followed-up at our GMP clinic either maintained or improved their weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Children at risk of undernutrition should be identified at an early age and through effective interaction between health workers and the family, their growth can be improved. Children of poor families can also benefit from this activity, provided a comprehensive approach is made available.